HI,欢迎来到期刊之家,学术咨询热线:18516839303
按期刊之家发行地区分类查找

如何撰写论文的讨论和结论部分,以提升SCI审稿通过率300%?(附例句模板)

时间:2024-07-15 11:13:54

SCI论文中的讨论部分该怎么写?

确实,要写好讨论部分并非易事。它需要你将研究结果与已知文献结论进行深入的对比分析,这无疑需要丰富的知识积累。讨论部分的真正目的,是通过这种对比分析,凸显你的研究的创新性和合理性。

在正式撰写讨论之前,你可以问自己以下6个问题,以确保逻辑自洽,讨论的全面深入:

  1. 我的假设是正确的吗?

  2. 如果我的假设只是部分正确,或者与已发表的文献结论完全不同,那么从我的结果中实际能推断出什么结论?

  3. 先前的研究对该主题已有哪些发现?我的结论如何改变或补充了该领域的现有知识?

  4. 为什么我的结果对该领域很重要?这些结果是否为科学共识增添了新的证据,或者反驳了先前的研究?

  5. 在我的研究基础上,未来的研究将如何进行?哪些关键实验是必须要进行的?

  6. 你最希望给读者留下哪个结论点的深刻印象?

关于讨论部分的框架结构:

通常,首段会再次总结论文的主要结果,并强调其意义。紧接着的2-5段,会结合已知文献逐一讨论对比每个结果,无论是相似还是相反,都会分析其原因。最后,会讨论本研究的局限性和优势。而在结论(Conclusion)部分,会再次总结本研究的主要贡献及意义。

讨论部分容易犯的错误有以下四点:

  1. 引入结果部分没有提到的新结论或证据。记住,讨论部分提到的所有结果必须在“结果(Results)”部分已经呈现过,不能在讨论部分引入新的结论。

  2. 对局限性或负面结果避而不谈。局限性和负面结果能让读者了解你的研究课题的全貌,是对你论文结果未涉及部分或不完美部分的有益补充,审稿人也会很关注这部分内容。

  3. “局限性(Limitations)”部分的撰写推翻了你的方法或结果部分的陈述。即使你的研究存在重大局限性,也不能以己之矛攻己之盾,推翻你自己的结果,否则论文将很难站得住脚。

  4. 夸大你的研究的重要性。对于你的研究如何充分解决重大问题做出过于宏大的陈述,会引起审稿人和读者的质疑。毕竟学术研究还是更提倡实事求是,有凭有据。

以下是一些讨论部分的例句模板:

总结本研究结果:

  • This study has identified …

  • The research has also shown that …

  • These experiments confirmed that …

  • This study has found that generally …

  • The investigation of X has shown that …

和以往研究进行对比分析:

支持过往研究结果:

  • This study confirms that X is associated with …

  • This finding is consistent with that of Smith (2000) who …

  • Comparison of the findings with those of other studies confirms …

  • This also accords with our earlier observations, which showed that …

  • These results corroborate the findings of a great deal of the previous work in …

  • In accordance with the present results, previous studies have demonstrated that …

  • Consistent with the literature, this research found that participants who reported using X also …

和过往研究结果相反:

  • This study has been unable to demonstrate that …

  • However, this result has not previously been described.

  • This outcome is contrary to that of Smith et al. (2001) who found …

  • This finding is contrary to previous studies which have suggested that …

  • In contrast to earlier findings, however, no evidence of X was detected.

  • The yields in this investigation were higher compared to those of other studies.

  • However, the findings of the current study do not support the previous research.

讨论本研究的局限性:

  • This current study is limited by the absence of …/the possible effect of …/the fact that it only surveyed …/by the fact that it was restricted to …

  • The most important limitation lies in the fact that …

  • The main weakness of this study was the paucity of …

未来研究展望:

  • A further study with more focus on X is therefore suggested.

  • There is abundant room for further progress in determining …

  • Future studies on the current topic are therefore recommended.

  • Further work is needed to develop reliable analytical methods for …

  • To develop a full picture of X, additional studies will be needed that …

  • In future investigations, it might be possible to use a different X in which …

免责声明以上文章内容均来源于其他网络渠道,仅供欣赏,不代表本站观点,与本站立场无关,仅供学习和参考。如有涉及到您的权益,请来信告知(email:mlunwen@163.com),我们核实后会立刻删除。

相关期刊